Terrence Malick’s fifth film in four decades is inarguably
an immensely personal endeavour. Awarded the treasured Palm D’Or at the Cannes
film festival, the Tree of Life was simultaneously
met with rigorous applause and derisive boos at its premier. Malick is renowned for his
uncompromising cinematic vision, yet the Tree
of Life has confused and divided audiences like never before.
The film chronicles the life of a young family growing up in
Texas during the 1950’s, set against a backdrop of cosmic creation, universal
inception and the end of life on earth. Oh, there are also some dinosaurs
thrown in for good measure. If it sounds deep, that’s because it is. With the Tree of Life, Malick is fully committed
to exploring the biggest question of all; what is the meaning of life?
Technically, Sean Penn is the film’s protagonist, yet his
screen time is limited and his dialogue even more so. This isn't a criticism of
Penn’s performance, on the contrary; his portrayal of the adult Jack is wrought
with guilt and regret. Brad Pitt excels in the somewhat unflattering role of a domineering
father at odds with the world and everything in it. The Tree of Life also happens to be the film that launched the now
blossoming career of Jessica Chastain, who radiates compassion and grace in her
splendid performance as the kind hearted mother of Jack. The real star
performances of Tree of Life however,
belong to the three young leads; Hunter McCracken, Laramie Eppler, and Tye Sheridan.
McCracken in particular is spectacular as the troubled young Jack, desperately
fighting to maintain his youthful innocence in the face of his advancing
teenage years.
With the Tree of Life,
Malick has created nothing short of a poet’s view of existence in this world. The film pays little attention to narrative
coherence, and instead demands that its audience observe, interpret and reflect
upon events unfolding on screen. Never before has a film tackled themes of such
tremendous weight, yet maintained enough emotional impact to resonate
effectively with viewers. Kubrick’s masterful 2001: a Space Odyssey delved deep into philosophical debate and
wowed audiences, yet left them cold and disengaged. The Tree of Life on the other hand, is malleable in its perception; the
film itself is shaped by the very existential beliefs and ideas of the
audience.
The Tree of Life
plays host to an abundance of philosophical themes, yet most prevalent of all
is the eternal struggle between nature and grace. Personified through the
characters of Pitt and Chastain, the film explores the contrasting urges to
satisfy basic human desires, and the will to show forgiveness, kindness, and
mercy. Nature, like the character of Pitt, uses “fierce will” to get ahead in
this world, whereas those who follow Chastain’s path of grace are able to live
freely, accepting that many things are out with their control. Jack must
navigate these conflicting ideals, resulting in an internal battle that demands
the very essence of his youth; innocence.
At its core, the Tree
of Life examines a man looking at his own existence, and what it means in
relation to God and to the universe. The film seems to assert that everyone is
connected, if only through the phenomenon of existence itself. Ultimately
Malick would suggest that we are incapable of achieving true “meaning” within
the context of the universe, but that our choices are of utmost importance to our
own lives and of those around us – which is of significant meaning in itself.
For a film so ambitiously epic in scale and scope, the Tree of Life is able to connect on an extraordinarily
intimate level. As he examines the loss of innocence, and the childhood
realisation that the father figure is in fact fallible, Malick is trespassing
on profoundly personal territory. Indeed, the Tree of Life is surely influenced at least in part by Malick’s own
childhood. Growing up in Texas himself in the 1950’s, and losing a brother at a young age, the film certainly seems to carry an autobiographical
overtone.
Impossibly ambitious, visually enthralling, and thematically
dense, the Tree of Life is inarguably
unique. Whilst certainly not to the taste of all, it would be foolish to deny
the brilliance of Malick’s Magnum Opus. The dawdling pace and lack of linear
narrative may be off putting to some, but even for non-Malick fans, this is
downright essential viewing. Undoubtedly one of the very best films of the
decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment