The hype surrounding Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar has been palpable. There
seems little doubt, that for better or worse, it’s set to be the filmic event
of the year.
I desperately tried to book IMAX tickets for the opening
night over a week ago, only to find that every single seat was booked out. Even
the 11.30pm screening, which probably didn’t finish until 3am, was completely
full. Fortunately, I managed to secure prominently located seats for the following
night, showings for which were also fully booked.
Having raked in close to $20 million on its opening night
(with limited release), Interstellar
is already showing financial promise, currently amassing more than last year’s
sci-fi box office smash, Gravity.
Boasting a marathon running time of 170 minutes, Interstellar’s plot is bolstered by dark stars and wormholes, with the
casual exploration of five-dimensional-space and a healthy dose of time travel
thrown in for good measure. It doesn’t exactly scream audience accessibility, does
it?
What then, can Interstellar
communicate about the film industry? It would suggest that tent pole
blockbusters don’t have to be bland and meaningless, it tells us that audiences
will pay to see high concept, extravagant filmmaking, and that not everyone is
satisfied with another stale Transformers
sequel. Most of all, it would suggest that audiences are much smarter than
studios give them credit for, and that people will watch anything that emerges
from the mind of the mighty Christopher Nolan.
It’s almost tempting to skip the plot summary entirely, not
only because it’s immensely difficult to construe comprehensibly and acutely, but
for fear of giving the game away.
Suffice to say, Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) is a former
NASA pilot turned farmer, scratching a living from a dying Earth with his two young
children. When things take a turn for the worse on the blue planet, Cooper is
persuaded by former mentor Professor Brand (Michael Caine) to embark on a
perilous mission in order to find a new home planet for the human race. Aided
by Brand’s daughter (Anne Hathaway), and astronauts Doyle (Wes Bentley) and
Romilly (David Gyasi), Cooper confronts the consequences of interstellar travel
and sets out on a monumental adventure to save mankind.
Chris Nolan has long mesmerised us with his uncanny ability
to harness the power of the image, a talent inherent in only the greatest of
filmmakers – the Kubricks, Malicks and Spielbergs of this world.
Think back to the brilliantly savage, alien landscapes of
the Alaskan wilderness in Insomnia. Or
the menacing figure of Batman perched atop a skyscraper, silhouetted by the
shimmering lights of a Chicago skyline. Or the city of Paris magnificently folding
on itself in one of the many vast dreamscapes of Inception. Or Tesla’s mist covered fields swathed in luminous bulbs
of light in The Prestige. The list is
endless, Nolan’s imagery saturate his films with a sense of wonder rarely
experienced in the modern multiplex.
Interstellar
itself certainly doesn’t skimp on wonder; a brief visit to a planet submerged
entirely in water is nothing short of breath-taking, while another planet -
completely engulfed in ice and rock – features frozen clouds that hover low in
the sky.
In an early, earth bound sequence, Cooper doggedly pursues a
surveillance drone he spies gliding across his farmland. The sequence that
ensues is positively Malickian in nature, with Cooper’s pick-up truck ploughing
through seemingly endless fields of lush green corn; a savage clash of machine
and nature.
Yet despite the visual splendour now so associated with a
Nolan production, one cannot help but feel that this is new territory for the
visionary filmmaker. Don’t be fooled by the sterility of space, and the parched
soil of a dying earth, for this is a far warmer Nolan enterprise than which we
have become acclimatised to.
It’s a well-documented fact that Steven Spielberg was
formerly attached to Interstellar,
and it’s not difficult to see why the story might appeal to the veteran
director. The awe inspiring sense of wonder that Interstellar so successfully conveys to the audience has been
notably absent in cinema as a whole since the glory days of Spielberg and Lucas
in the early 1980’s. But it’s the intimate father-daughter dynamic, so crucial
in holding the intergalactic adventure together, that would have drifted nicely
into the bearded wonder’s wheelhouse.
While many of Nolan’s previous films have featured parents
estranged from their children, they rarely seem to evolve past the point of
progressing the narrative. The loving relationship that binds Cooper to his
children – especially his daughter, Murph – is the beating heart of Interstellar.
When Cooper is finally presented with the knowledge that in
order to save Murph, he must leave her, Nolan lets us have it. The heart
wrenching goodbye between father and daughter early in the film would threaten
even the most steely of eyes with a tear, and despite the visual panache, one
of Interstellar’s greatest moments is
centred on a father stricken by grief at having missed his children growing up.
One wonder’s if Spielberg himself could have done better.
Which brings me nicely on to McConaughey, a man reborn.
Cooper is the latest in a long run of knockout performances for the Texan
actor. Enjoying what is quite possibly the biggest comeback since John Travolta
sought solace in the character of Vincent Vega, McConaughey is currently
sitting pretty atop Hollywood’s elite. Next up – Gus Van Sant’s Sea of Trees, you can just about hear
the Oscar buzz already…
Also impressive is the young Mackenzie Foy as Murph, her strong
performance instilling the film with much of its emotional heft. Nolan regular
Michael Caine is ever watchable, with strong support offered by Jessica
Chastain, Casey Affleck, Wes Bentley, and John Lithgow. Anne Hathaway, clearly
eager to work with Nolan again after her scene stealing performance as Selena
Kyle in The Dark Knight Rises,
struggles through a clunky monologue around the film’s midway point, but is
otherwise excellent as Brand’s daughter.
Veteran composer Hans Zimmer returns to score Interstellar. Like previous Nolan/Zimmer
collaborations, the soundtrack is loud, really loud. There are even times when
the thunderous music actually renders the dialogue of characters
incomprehensible, which is a minor gripe, albeit a frustrating one. The score
itself is of a more classical nature than previous collaborations, which
certainly lends itself to the theme of space travel – established long ago by
the marriage of classical music and cosmos bound adventure in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
I’m actually surprised I’ve made it this far without
mentioning Kubrick’s magnum opus, for its influence is undeniably felt
throughout Interstellar. Then again,
has there been a “space” film released in the past five decades that has
somehow managed to evade 2001’s
gravitational pull? I think not. That being said, comparisons to 2001 are not unjust. Both Kubrick and
Nolan are transfixed with exploration, and with knowing the unknowable – ultimately,
are we alone in the universe?
Rather than ignore 2001’s
existence entirely, Nolan subtly acknowledges its influence on his vision.
Artificial intelligence construct TARS at one point threatens to blow Cooper
out of the airlock, a faint reference to HAL’s on board revolution in 2001. Even the very design of TARS is
startlingly similar to 2001’s mysterious
monolith.
In Nolan’s film, interstellar travel is only made possible
because somebody – referred to only as “they” – created a wormhole near Saturn.
Likewise, in 2001, Dave Bowman’s
ultimate journey is only made possible because “somebody” located the all-powerful
monolith next to Jupiter. It’s also possible to draw similarities between the
climaxes of both films, although I won’t go into details for fear of spoiling Interstellar’s significantly less ambiguous
ending.
Perhaps what 2001
and Interstellar have in common most
of all however, are brilliantly intelligent, ambitious directors, unprepared to
compromise in pursuit of their immense visions. Upon its theatrical release back
in 1969, Kubrick’s 2001 split both
audiences and critics down the middle. Now, five decades later, it’s widely
regarded as one of the greatest films ever made. While nowhere near as
ambiguous nor as challenging as Kubrick’s visionary creation, Interstellar will likely prove divisive
for many, and only when the dust finally settles will it be possible to compare
the two epic productions.
Combining the visceral thrills of event cinema, the heart
and soul of Spielberg’s finest, and the uncompromising vision of Kubrick’s 2001, Interstellar is a work of colossal ambition. True, it may not fire
on all fronts all of the time, but the greatness of Interstellar more than makes up for any nagging complaints – be it
clunky dialogue or tacked on exposition.
With Interstellar,
Christopher Nolan reminds us of a time where we looked up at the night sky in
awe, rendered insignificant by the promise of a universe just out with our
reach. Interstellar is ultimately a
tale of hope, love, and sheer, reckless ambition.
In a modern world where we are forever looking downwards,
scrutinising videos of dancing cats on our iPhones, it’s important to reminisce
every now and then.
See it.
Now.
On the biggest screen you can find.
No comments:
Post a Comment